Perl && vs. and – || vs. or Benchmark

I want to compare the && vs. the and operator, and the || vs. or operator in Perl:

#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Benchmark qw(:all) ;
 
my $x = 100;
my $y = 0;
 
cmpthese(-1, {
'and'  => sub {if($y and $x){print;}print;},
'&&'   => sub {if($y &&  $x){print;}print;},
});
cmpthese(-1, {
'or'   => sub {if($y or  $x){print;}print;},
'||'   => sub {if($y ||  $x){print;}print;},
});
 
++$y;

cmpthese(-1, {
'and'  => sub {if($y and $x){print;}print;},
'&&'   => sub {if($y &&  $x){print;}print;},
});
cmpthese(-1, {
'or'   => sub {if($y or  $x){print;}print;},
'||'   => sub {if($y ||  $x){print;}print;},
});

First result (1 && 0) vs. (1 and 0):

         Rate  && and  
&&  4497569/s  -- -3%  
and 4626070/s  3%  --

Second result (1 or 0) vs. (1 || 0):

        Rate   or   || 
or 2683073/s   -- -15% 
|| 3163806/s  18%   --

Third result (1 && 1) vs. (1 and 1):

         Rate  && and  
&&  2525239/s  -- -1%  
and 2548621/s  1%  --

Fourth result (1 or 1) vs. (1 || 1):

        Rate   or   || 
or 2912710/s   -- -33% 
|| 4324590/s  48%   --

It seems the “and” and “&&” don’t make really different, but the “or” and “||” operator seems different.I don’t know why the “||” are 18-48% faster than the “or” …. and the “and” is only about 1-3% faster.

Now we check if they work as they should:

if(false() and true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(false() &&  true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(false() or  true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(false() ||  true()){print;}print"END\n";

 
if(true() and true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(true() &&  true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(true() or  true()){print;}print"END\n";
if(true() ||  true()){print;}print"END\n";


sub true() {print "sub true";return(1);}
sub false() {print "sub false";return(0);}

result looks good they abort if a true is impossible:

sub falseEND        
sub falseEND        
sub falsesub trueEND
sub falsesub trueEND
sub truesub trueEND 
sub truesub trueEND 
sub trueEND         
sub trueEND

That is more a check up and not really a Benchmark.